| WHY
A PAGE ON PEACE HEROES?
by David Krieger, President
of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
A hero, according to Webster, is a mythological or legendary
figure often of divine descent endowed with great strength
or ability; an illustrious warrior; a man admired for
his achievements and noble qualities; one that shows great
courage; the principal male character in a literary or
dramatic work; the central figure of an event, period
or movement; an object of extreme admiration and devotion.
The concept of hero seems antiquated, as from a bygone
era. The traditional hero has been a man (seldom a woman)
writ large, larger than life. The hero is seen as a central
figure in the drama of history, a leader whose strength
and spirit shape destiny. The hero is defined and described
by the culture so as to glorify and give meaning to the
culture. The hero turns the tide of events, leads his
people to victory, and overcomes obstacles that would
defeat less determined mortals. The hero, in short, is
ascribed qualities that stretch our human boundaries and
imaginations. The hero emerges as a cultural icon, often
with god-like qualities, and is the focus of myth.
Cultures need heroes. Myths of heroism provide a mirror
to a culture and a concept of the ideal for educating
new generations. The heroes a culture selects reflect
the values of that culture. Cultures often warp the mirror
of history, in part by the selection and creation of heroes
that reflect the culture as triumphant and indomitable.
The culture, in the manner of the evil queen in Snow White,
asks the question, "Mirror, mirror on the wall, who
is the most powerful of all?" It shapes its heroes
to provide the answer: "You are."
From within the culture, it is difficult, if not impossible,
to see that the mirror is warped. From the outside, however,
it is virtually impossible to miss the distortion.
Taking a penetrating look at heroes forces us to take
an equally hard look at ourselves. To ask the question,
"Who are our heroes?" is to also ask, "Who
are we?" and "What do we represent as a culture?"
From an individual's perspective, a choice of heroes
is a choice of affiliations, a selection of the "we"
that a person chooses to help shape his or her identity.
In most cultures today it is the nation-state that exerts
the greatest claim on one's identity and affiliation.
In modern nation-states, heroes are almost invariably
the products of indoctrination and public relations efforts.
Building upon partial historical truths, heroes are created
and enlarged from the fabric of history. In repeating
the stories of heroes, cultures help define themselves,
create a consensus reality, and transmit values to new
generations.
Cultural heroes may take many forms, depending on the
culture and the values it reflects. Heroes may be gods
or warriors or ordinary mortals. Heroes may be leaders
of valor and wisdom or simply celebrities. They may be
brutal dictators or wise and decent individuals. Many
dictators have built "cults of personality"
to glorify themselves as heroes and their achievements
as heroic. Democratic governments are not immune to glorifying
political leaders of meager stature, but they are also
more capable of toppling such idols.
Just as cultures define themselves in part by those they
identify as heroes, so do individuals. Heroes, after all,
are in the eyes of the beholder. There are no rigid criteria
that define a hero. Cultures may honor heroes to help
in fostering a cultural identity conducive to patriotism,
but heroes cannot be forced on individuals. Ultimately,
each person is free to decide in the deepest recesses
of intellect and spirit who he or she chooses, if anyone,
as a hero.
This volume rejects the concept of hero as war maker.
It offers instead a selection of alternative heroes whose
successes are measured not by leadership in the organized
and culturally sanctioned murder or warfare, but by their
courage, commitment and compassion in seeking peace.
The heroes in this volume, selected by college interns
at the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, include such great
leaders as Gandhi, Einstein, and Martin Luther King, Jr.,
but also included are heroes that may be unfamiliar to
many readers.
Fame and celebrity are not and should not be criteria
for heroism. Fame in and of itself has no claim on heroism
and is a poor reason for idolatry. Basing heroism on celebrity
alone trivializes the concept and sacrifices our standards
of human achievement. The heroes in this volume have been
chosen for their actions, not their renown.
The men and women selected for inclusion in this volume
have set high standards of achievement for the common
good. They have often made uncommon effort and sacrifice
to uphold human rights and human dignity against abuse,
oppression, and violence. Their lives have made a difference.
They have stood for peace, justice, and decency, often
against the crowd and the broader culture. They have spoken
truth in the face of power, and have not flinched when
power has responded in vicious and violent ways.
All of the heroes in this volume have struggled. Some
prevailed in achieving their goals. Many did not. They
share a commitment to human decency and to the prevention
of violence. All persevered in their pursuit of peace.
All have sacrificed. All have made a difference in leaving
the world a better place. All have influenced others around
them by their acts. We hope that their lives will inspire
you to greater efforts toward a peaceful future.
Rarely does an individual set out to be a hero, but each
of us chooses his or her course in life. If that course
is for the common good, and is pursued with perseverance,
one may in time become a hero in the eyes of those who
witness the commitment. What is important is not to strive
to be a hero, but to do what is right and decent in all
the small acts and decisions of one's life. It is the
way one lives that ultimately matters more than any rewards
or acclamations one receives. It is the effort, day by
day, that becomes the opus of one's life. It is the effort,
more than any achievement or recognition, that makes a
hero.
|