|
Current
Presidential Candidates
President George W. Bush:
The Bush 2001 Nuclear Posture Review called for the
development of new, more “usable” nuclear
weapons; for developing contingency plans for the use
of nuclear weapons against nuclear and non-nuclear states;
and for reducing the time required for the United States
to resume nuclear weapons testing. Below are statements
taken from the Review:
"Nuclear weapons play a critical role in the defense
capabilities of the United States, its allies and friends.
They provide credible military options to deter a wide
range of threats, including WMD and large-scale conventional
military force. These nuclear capabilities possess unique
properties that give the United States options to hold
at risk classes of targets [that are] important to achieve
strategic and political objectives."
"Advances in defensive technologies will allow
U.S. non-nuclear and nuclear capabilities to be coupled
with active and passive defenses to help provide deterrence
and protection against attack, preserve U.S. freedom
of action, and strengthen the credibility of U.S. alliance
commitments."
“Nuclear weapons could be employed against targets
able to withstand non-nuclear attack, (for example,
deep underground bunkers or bio-weapon facilities)."
"The need is clear for a revitalized nuclear weapons
complex that will: ...be able, if directed, to design,
develop, manufacture, and certify new warheads in response
to new national requirements; and maintain readiness
to resume underground nuclear testing if required."
John Kerry:
“George Bush is taking the world in the wrong
direction. He is poised to set off a new nuclear arms
race by building bunker-busting tactical nuclear weapons
-- smaller and more usable nuclear bombs. I don’t
want a world with more useable nuclear bombs. I don’t
want America to turn its back on half a century of effort
by every President to reduce the nuclear threat. I’m
running to put America where we rightfully belong --
leading the way to a new international accord on nuclear
proliferation to make the world itself safer for human
survival.”
Dennis Kucinich:
“A Kucinich administration would work to end nuclear
proliferation by actually setting an example for the
rest of the world by turning away from the true weapons
of mass destruction. Nuclear disarmament would be a
priority and the madness of moving towards battlefield
nuclear weapons would be reversed.”
Ralph Nader:
"Our foreign policy must redefine the elements
of global security, peace, arms control, an end to
nuclear weapons and expand the many assets of our
country to launch, with other nations, major initiatives
against
global infections diseases (such as AIDS, malaria,
tuberculosis and virulent flu epidemics) which have
and are coming to our country in increasingly drug
resistant strains.”
To find out more on presidential candidate’s position
on US nuclear weapons policy, go to
http://www.wagingpeace.org/menu/action/urgent-actions/us-nuclear-weapons-policy/index.htm
|