Stopping a Rogue
Superpower: Time Is Running Out
by David Krieger*, March 2002
"If another country were planning to develop
a new nuclear weapon and contemplating preemptive strikes against
a list of non-nuclear powers, Washington would rightly label that
nation a dangerous rogue state."
-- New York Time Editorial, March 12, 2002
In April the parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty (NPT), the world's most important international agreement
to achieve non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament, will meet
at the United Nations to review progress toward achieving the
goals of the Treaty. They will undoubtedly conclude that the Treaty
stands in peril, as do the people of the world, due to the failure
of the nuclear weapons states to fulfill their obligations under
the Treaty to achieve progress on nuclear disarmament. This failure
has been driven by the actions of the world's only superpower.
The United States has acted in defiance of the
international community in flagrantly failing to fulfill its promises
and in actions undermining nuclear arms control treaties. The
United States, under its current administration, has taken the
following actions in direct opposition to the 13 Practical Steps
for Nuclear Disarmament agreed to by all parties to the Non-Proliferation
Treaty at the 2000 NPT Review Conference:
- given notice of its intention to withdraw from
the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in order to unilaterally
pursue missile defenses and the weaponization of outer space;
- failed to ratify and promote the entry into
force of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, and made plans to
shorten the time needed to resume underground nuclear testing;
- developed contingency plans to use nuclear weapons
against at least seven countries, five of which are non-nuclear
weapons states that are parties to the NPT, in direct contradiction
to long-standing security assurances given to countries without
nuclear weapons;
- made nuclear war more likely by making plans
to use nuclear weapons for specific purposes, such as bunker
busting or destroying chemical or biological weapons stockpiles,
and by developing smaller, more useable nuclear weapons; and
- made nuclear "disarmament" easily
reversible by implementing policies that place deactivated nuclear
warheads in storage rather than destroying them.
Taken together, these polices demonstrate a clear
failure to pursue the "unequivocal undertaking" to achieve
nuclear disarmament that was agreed to at the 2000 NPT Review
Conference. Rather, these unilateral policies threaten the entire
non-proliferation regime and raise the specter of nuclear war.Time
is running out, and what is at stake is the future of humanity
and all life. The nations and people of the world are challenged
to stop a "rogue" superpower, uphold the Non-Proliferation
Treaty and fulfill the goal of nuclear disarmament before disaster
strikes.
*David Krieger is president
of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.
|